The Killing of Rosencrantz and Guildenstern :: essays research papers

The Killing of Rosencrantz and GuildensternHamlets own Philosophic view.     In term of Hamlets own philosophic view, the putting to death of Rosencrantz and Guildenstern is very out-of-character. Hamlet is an intellectual, and therefore believes that killing is not a necessary solution (this could also relate to wherefore he hesitates so long at killing Claudius). He does this more than out of anger and revenge than out of his own will and near(a) judgement. As somewhat of a justification he says,"Ere I could betray a prologue to my brains,They had begun the play-",proving that, given time to think about his actions, he likely would not have done it.Hamlets goal of Revenge     As far-off as his goals of revenge go yes this was an act of personal vengeance for Hamlet, besides it did nothing to aid in his ordered revenge of his fathers death. Although somewhat justifiable, as the two were conspiring with the king against him, th eir deaths were not very practical. It is, in fact, completely slick that Rosencrantz and Guildenstern had no idea of the contents of the earn they carried, thus nullifying the whole pinnacle of the revenge put upon them, and putting the deaths of two innocents on Hamlets head. If they did know what the letters contained, however, it was one of Hamlets high points in the play. He actually accomplishes something instead of analyzing it to death, displaying the configuration of action he should have taken towards killing Claudius.In call of Todays Moral Standards     Crimes of passion are the most common crimes that result in death and Hamlets actions displayed just that. He was anger driven, and blind to reason, reacting emotionally, without thinking besides much about the end results or circumstances of his deed.