Argumentative Essay Against Euthanasia Essay

IntroductionEuthanasia is the practice of deliberately killing a person to spare him or her from having to deal with more pain and suffering. This is invariably a controversial issue because of the moral and ethical components that are involved. This news report pull up s nurses discuss the arguments against euthanasia.DiscussionEuthanasia is clearly against the Hippocratic affidavit that all doctors have to fulfil. This oath basically states that doctors must neer be involved in the killing of tribe because after all, they have been clever to en authoritative that people are able to recover from their diseases and injuries. Doctors are the ones whom people entrust their lives whenever on that point is something wrong with their health. Thus, it is the responsibility of the doctors to always do the better they sess to help people live and enjoy their lives (Cavan 48). If their patients die downstairs their supervision, the doctors throne accept this for as long as they k now and can prove that they really did their scoop up and exhausted all possibilities to ensure the excerpt of the patients. There are just certain instances where the disease or the injury of the patients has be hang so serious that it is already hard to treat and cultivate the patients recover. In these cases, it is unfair to blame the doctors for the death of the patients. The Hippocratic Oath helps the doctors to go out how important their responsibilities are to the people in terms of their health. This oath in any case provides an assurance to the people that they can trust their doctors and be assured that they will do whatever is necessary to help them deal with their health problems. If euthanasia becomes legalized, then the effectiveness of the Hippocratic Oath will be negated and the doctors can have the option of immediately resorting to euthanasia especially in difficult cases instead of trying their best until the very end.Another argument against euthanasia is that it is essentially homicidebecause the doctors will kill the patient even if it has been approved by the patient himself or the family of the patient. Euthanasia is not that different from murder because they both involve killing a person. The only difference is that in euthanasia, thither is mercy and consent involved while in murder there is none (Tulloch 82). If murder is prohibited by law because people take matters into their own hands and kill others, then euthanasia should also be banned because doctors take matters into their own hands and kill their patients even if there is consent from the patients and their families or relatives.Lastly, the continued improvements and innovations in the field of medicine and health care make euthanasia illogical to be implemented as an option. The reason why medical experts continue to work hard to come up with improved medical technologies, medicines and treatment methods is that they want to make sure that the sick people are able to recover faster and good people become even healthier. All of these efforts are being through with(p) to make the society become more productive due to the armorial bearing of healthy and strong people (McDougall 26). Thus, doctors will not have an acknowledgment for not doing their best for their patients as they already have access to the best medical technologies, medicines and treatment methods that will prevent them from having to resort to euthanasia as the only option.ConclusionThere is no doubt that euthanasia unavoidably to be banned as based on the three arguments discussed above, it does not deserve a place in human society. Doctors must never give up on their patients no matter how hopeless the web site might be. They must exhaust all options to give their patients a flake chance to survive and