4 main threats to Antarctica

Tourism Strange as it whitethorn be Antarctica is gradu bothy developing into a popular tourer destination. This is because heap who adopt been around the foundation and seen places like Niagara falls and Ayers rock and virtually other natural phenomenas like the idea of going to Antarctica and acquiring photos of penguins etc. The task with this is that it upsets the local wild invigoration and git make disrupt mating season with indisputable species. Some of the ecosystems are so delicate that sluice the slightest human limp might disrupt them. These ecosystems must be protected at all costs and to protect them we cannot have tourists looking at them taking pictures getting involved with these animals who until recently had never seen a human before.Another abominable thing about humans is wherever we go we tend to surrender a mess and litter could severely damage the environment. Can you call back a lichen/moss has taken hundreds of days to grow to finally get in a higher place the ice and survive only for a human to step on it and kill it? This is something that we cannot risk but tourism has a plus side. For font it leave behind provide another source of income that could help scientific equerries and if the proposed tourist building is built it leave allow the scientists to work and do something variant apart from research. It is hoped that this building would help tourism to expand from the present 2500 tourists a year. But how to protect animals from tourists? Is a in truth intelligent question and a set of rules has been developed so that visitors can get a good experience without disturbing the wildlife too much. at that place is not much we can do to discourage tourism but we can set a limit to the amount of people allowed on the continent and make accredited that they follow a set of guidelines so that they do not intermeddle with the wildlife.Mining This is another outsized threat because things like oil and combust and minerals like copper and iron will not last forever. And the enigma is that Antarctica has the worlds largest coal deposits and possibly huge stores of oil that could be used to cite tens of billions of barrels of oil. It also contains several(prenominal) large deposits of iron ore and even some of gold and silver. This leaves a dilemma because if the resources run out then(prenominal) Antarctica could s good be the answer to the problems but on that point are m any downsides to minelaying in Antarctica. It would be very, very expensive because all food, water and equipment would have to be imported and then on top of that the minerals would have to be exported but to where, and how? It is a very hard problem to resolve. As well as the problem with transport as hard as that is obtaining the minerals. to the highest degree are buried beneath tonnes of ice and it would be extremely insecure trying to retrieve them. Another point is that the minerals and coal are very low qual ity and not worth risking lives and money for.The treaty has forbidden mining for 50 years and even after that time it whitethorn not even be considered. But by that time soulfulness may have developed a way of getting the materials inexpensively and quickly who can tell? Currently there seems no film for a solution so it is not yet a problem but some time in the future it may be so we have to be prepare.Global change this is a big threat because if the ice caps were to melt then sea levels would definitely organise considerably. Also it is not just resolve ice caps that are touch-and-go but moving ice caps. Huge sections of ice are good luck off from the main mass of ice and drifting away on the currents. Could you imagine what would happen if a section of ice with a village of penguins went floating away to a warmer continent where they could not determine food? It is unsatisfactory but at the present time there is nothing we can do to completely halt global warming but reducing will help slow down the melting ice although there is little that can be done.Fishing There is a danger that krill and other small fish will be over fished and that mean a huge danger for all the animals in the Antarctic. Krill provide food for nearly every sea animal and if they are over fished then the other will starve. This means that the krill must be protected at all costs and made sure that their numbers pool are not allowed to drop. It takes 20 years for a fish to develop and so over angle is a great danger. By weighty fish quotas and the time the boats are allowed to fish in the waters will help to keep up krill numbers and not over fish.Opinions we interviewed several different people and asked what they thought about the Antarctic and what should be done. Nipponese whale hunter Hunting whales is my livelihood and my family and I would starve if I couldnt hunt whales. Around the Antarctic there are lots of whales and we should be able to hunt them. I know we may put them in danger but there would be too more jobs wooly if we werent allowed to do it.Australian fisherman I know that over fishing is a danger but we have to get enough fish to make money. I agree limiting the fish quota would help banish over fishing but they must not lower the fishing quota too much or we wont be able to make any money.Scientist I am totally against any form of development, mining and even tourism because Antarctica, as the last wilderness on earth, cannot afford to be ruined by human corruption. If we allow too many tourists too come or too many fish to be caught then the whole eco-system that has survived for so long with no human interference will collapse.Politician It is my view that eventually some development on Antarctica should be considered but for now we should look to preserve it. Although it will require an income and many people may not get as much break as they did this cannot be helped if he purity that is Antarctica is to be kept safe.I n my opinion I believe that Antarctica should be kept the way it is although peradventure making it into a huge wildlife preserve or a world park seem like very reasonable ideas. Every cautiousness must be taken to prevent over fishing and the animals life from being disturbed. I leave you with this thought. In a hundred years the worlds population could have doubled and every spare inch of lay will be taken up by housing. Would you see a place like Antarctica filled up with houses? It may happen so I suggest we try to keep it perfect while we palliate can and try to find out as much as we can before its too late.