Wednesday, July 17, 2019

Nature and Function of Literary Criticism Essay

The intelligence agency tyroism is derived from the Greek word core judgment. Hence, dilettanteism was cognize to be the exercise of judgment on kit and caboodle of literature, or it can be say that blame is the play of mind to view the merits and defects on the dress of literature. A critic , therefore, is a person who expresses judgment on plant of literature or song or the art of an artist or a painter. The critic is also be as a person who is possess of the knowledge necessary to enable him to read compensate judgments upon the merits or worth of such(prenominal) working as come deep down its province.However, the question that is always asked, does the critic has the right to judge or not ? Indeed, no one has the right to judge the masses because of two reasons. Firstly, to judge the people is something congenital in other words, when a critic measure a literary work he is judge based on or influenced by his personal feelings, savors, or opinions. Second, when a critic judge and evaluate a literary work , he eliminates the readers mind and inactivate his faculty of thinking and epitome.Its known that the target group of the critics is the public reader, so what do they want from the reader and what is the last objective of comment?. Actually, the modern understand of criticism is regarded as having two various functions which helps to achieve the main purposes of criticism.The Modern agreement of CriticismCriticism is the process of analysis and description and interpretation of literary works for the purpose of increasing understanding and cosmetic surgery appreciation. This means that the critic should penetrate to the shopping mall of the literary work to analyze and spurt its meaning , to disengage and describe its qualities of powerfulness and beauty , and to elucidate by condition examination the artistic and moral principles which, whether the source himself was conscious of them or not , cast actually guided and controlled his labors, and then to speak a right rating of a literary work.Its worth to fancy that criticism does not depend on a critics views or his opinions , besides it depends on scientific understructure which is CriticalTheories. As a result, criticisms are completely different depending on the surmise that the critic uses.Thus, the objective of literary criticism is to determine the artistic cheers, poetic beauty, or the features being regarded as inadequate animate in the works of literature in order to 1-Helping the reader to gain a unwrap understanding of nature and value of literature, and a better appreciation of the merriment proper to literature, then to form an evaluation of his own. 2- Helping the writer to improve his skills and urge on to achieve the merits while allowing him to overcome the flaws if any. At this stage, it would be appropriate to say that criticism is not just fault- finding , but helping the writer or poets or artists in achieving t he excellence in their works and leading the reader to a better understanding and appreciation. At this point , the state of T.S Eilot is worth mentioning, The end of criticism is the illuminance of works of art and to correction of taste.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.